As said before,there would be too many problems for us to even comprehend.For your first question
,WoR has a different regimental system,companies are known by some callsigns,so that saves them from bein confused,ere we don't,instead regiments are known by famous names such as the 28th The Slashers or the 30th The Triple XXX's.Having 2 regiments by those names is nigh confusin,so it's better just to have 1.Onto your second one
,do you really think regiments will be satisfied by having simple alphabetical tags?No offence ofc,but they want to be known for their own number and tags,not just have another duplicate regiment with the same name.This would cause too much drama and anyway's who would be A and who B?That's a question I'll leave for you to ponder.For the 3rd one
,we all know some people ere aren't as mature as we all wish they would be,ofc we can't take names used over 200 years ago,but remember this is a video game,some people tend to take their historical approaches quite seriously.Say if we have 2 66ths,both leaders want to have the same historical leader's name,now only one of them can be known by that name,yes?This is something we as a community can't really change about people.4th one
,yes that solves it,but as of yet we don't have sub-boards for EU,NA and AU/NZ events,so for just now,we'll be confused between both 95th's unless they reach some sort of mutual understanding.
Sorry for the long passages,just difficult to give answers